Uncertainty is one of the worst things that
can happen to a film. The proof of this is The Time Machine.
The film is, of course, based on the famous
H. G. Wells story of the same name. This incarnation is directed
by the author's great-grandson, Simon Wells. Normally, I try
not to reference a DVD's extra content while talking about the
film, but there are some telling revelations in the commentary
track for this disc. Wells and editor Wayne Wahrman discuss
in great detail many scenes that they trimmed (but wish they
hadn't), scenes they never filmed (and wish they had) and scenes
that they wished they had filmed differently. Never did I get
the impression that there was some outside force keeping them
from making the film they wanted. Rather it was their own doubt
about whether or not they could pull it off.
This is too bad because, as I've said before,
it's much more interesting to watch someone swing for the fence
and miss than to watch them try to play it safe.
The elements exist within the film for an
entertaining story: The actors are all first-rate, the visuals
are dutifully stunning, and the story, well, the story is a
classic. Unfortunately, Wells (the director, not the author)
has managed to put all of the mechanics up on screen and none
of the heart.
Guy Pierce, from the wonderful film Memento,
stars as Alexander Hartigan. Hartigan is a college professor
who, in his spare time, invents such things as microwave ovens
and time machines. Like all movie inventors, Hartigan is a distracted
man and can't seem to remember the little details, such as the
day he intends to propose to his girlfriend, Emma (Sienna Guillory).
While on their date, Alexander and Emma are
accosted by a robber. Emma is shot during a struggle to keep
her engagement ring and dies in the inventor's arms. This is
certainly a tragic event, but the film handles it so soon in
the story and so clumsily, that the audience is never given
time to care about the relationship (nor are we shown any convincing
evidence that Hartigan cares about it either).
The film cuts from the dying Emma to Hartigan
busily writing on a chalkboard. A title card tells us that four
years have passed and by all appearances, Hartigan has spent
that entire time writing on this chalkboard. He has perfected
his time travel theories and built a time machine. His intention
is to use the machine to travel back in time to save Emma. The
plan fails and Emma dies once again.
Hartigan is convinced that the answers as
to why he can't change the past must lie in the future, so he
journeys to the year 2030. He spends about 10 minutes in this
future world before deciding that he won't find any answers
here, so he quickly hops back in his time machine to travel
even further in to the future. For an inventor and scientist,
this seems a very odd choice, considering that he makes his
decision after only consulting the library, rather than any
reputable scientific journals, or even a reputable scientist
or two.
His journey into the future is interrupted
and he finds himself in the year 2037. A construction project
on the moon has gone horribly wrong, disrupting the moon's orbit
and causing catastrophy on Earth. Again, leaving as quickly
as he arrives, Hartigan fires up the time machine once again.
A bump on the head knocks him unconscious, leaving him hurtling
thousands of centuries into the future. He finally stops the
machine some 800,000 later.
In this future world, Hartigan learns that
humans have evolved into two separate species. The Eloi live
above ground and the Morlocks live below. For reasons not adequately
explained, the Morlocks feed upon the Eloi (apparently there
are no other mammals on the planet to eat) and the Eloi seem
to accept this as their fate. Even more strange is the fact
that after 800,000, the Eloi still speak English. The film's
explanation for how the language was preserved would be positively
absurd in any other film, but in this one is only par for the
course.
Hartigan makes it his personal mission to
save the Eloi from the Morlocks. Given that the film has gone
to great lengths to show us how single-mindedly focused Hartigan
is on time travel and finding out why he can't save Emma, this
sudden inspiration to become a hero seems out of place and contrived.
For all of the faults with the story, The
Time Machine looks fantastic. Had even a fraction of the effort
put into the visuals been channeled into story and characters,
this might have been a better film. As is, The Time Machine
is severely underdeveloped, glossing over areas that it should
spend more time with. This isn't to say that watching the film
was an entirely bad experience. In its own way, it was a fun
movie to watch. But that's just the problem: watching is all
it's good for. It's impossible to care at all about the story,
making for a film that, when it ends, is entirely forgettable.