I'm willing to forgive Michael Bay for Bad
Boys and The Rock. Both movies are stylish and, in their own
way, cool. Bad Boys suffers from a horribly recycled plot, but
the charisma of Will Smith and Martin Lawrence help to sell
it. The Rock is nearly equally rehashed and certainly as goofy,
but it has Nicholas Cage, Sean Connery and Ed Harris and not
even Bay can ruin that chemistry.
There is only so far you can go without substance,
however, and Armageddon is the proof of that.
Let me back up a little.
Armageddon tells the story of an asteroid
on a collision course for Earth. This thing is big (the size
of Texas, we're told) and only 18 days away when it's finally
spotted -- by a white trash astronomer, no less, who manages
to determine that this rock will hit the Earth without bothering
with the trivial details, such as actually plotting its course.
Don't plan on logic and plausibility helping
you out as both are cheerfully tossed out the window of this
visual train wreck. It makes Deep Impact, the other "stellar
object speeding toward Earth to doom us all" film that
year, look like a NASA training video. Bay seems to be trying
to hide the idiocy in this film by cutting from scene to scene
at a pace that suggests he's auditioning to be the poster boy
for Attention Deficit Disorder.
I knew this movie was in trouble when I began
concentrating more on counting clichés than on the plot
(I believe my count started about two minutes into the film).
And still, after being bombarded with cliché after cliché
after cliché, I sat in stunned disbelief when the ultimate
suspense crutch - the "which wire to cut on the bomb"
scenario - was thrust into story. Keep in mind that this bomb
is not a terrorist device, but rather one of the tools of the
film's heroes. The only possible conclusion I can come to is
that of the nine scriptwriters for this film, only one of them
understood that it was actually about an asteroid.
The rest of the story is simple, if not absurd:
Our only hope for survival is to send someone to blow up the
asteroid. Naturally, Bruce Willis must go - who else would you
get to blow something up real good? Willis and his crew of oil
drillers are given crash (no pun intended) astronaut training,
presumably because it's easier to teach someone to be an astronaut
in 18 days than it is to teach someone to drill a hole. We're
actually expected to believe that the same group of NASA engineers
who send up a Space Shuttle just about every time you turn around
can't read a blueprint well enough to assemble a drill. Golly.
Maybe NASA should hire Willis' team to build that space station
for us, too.
At the end of training, the team is sent off
into space, that most dangerous of environments where gravity
depends solely on the needs of the script and space stations
explode just to make sure that an audience already suffering
from input overload never gets a moment to catch its breath.
Along the way we get: a good ol' boy who heads
NASA (and always wanted to be an astronaut but is crippled);
a girl pining for her boyfriend in space; a love-hate relationship
between two heroes; a kooky group of misfits that always "get
the job done"; a father estranged from his wife and kids,
but just might redeem himself if he can save the world; a stereotypical
Russian; an explosion every two minutes; a seemingly cool-headed
astronaut who goes crazy and tries to kill everyone; and last,
but certainly not least, the infamous and previosuly mentioned
scene where everyone's fate rests on which wire to cut to disarm
the bomb. But that's just scratching the surface. Perhaps the
true motivation behind Armageddon was to make it the visual
dictionary for bad clichés.
I think the only thing missing is having
one of the characters "talked in" to land the shuttle.
Oh well, I guess you can't think of everything. Then again,
perhaps Bay and crew were hoping to save something for a sequel.